2011 Most Expensive homes in SF

What were the most expensive homes sold in San Francisco during the 2011 calendar year? I always have to wait for the tax records to catch up with December recordings, but now that they have, the results are in. It was a blockbuster year for luxury real estate in 2011!

2840 Broadway

2840 Broadway, Sales Price: $33,000,000

2950 Broadway

2950 Broadway, Sales Price: $29,500,000

188 Minna, The St. Regis

188 Minna St., Penthouse A, Sales Price: $ 28,000,000

2920 Broadway

2920 Broadway, Sales Price: $23,473,000

3070 Pacific Ave., Sales Price: $20,000,000

3070 Pacific Ave., Sales Price: $20,000,000

3701 Washington

3701 Washington, Sales Price: $12,100,000

2550 Green St.

2550 Green St., Sales Price: $9,500,000

3362 Jackson St.

3362 Jackson St., Sales Price: $9,250,000

2323 Hyde St.

2323 Hyde St., Sales Price: $9,000,000

60 Normandie Terr.

60 Normandie Terrace, Sales Price: $8,800,000

To refresh your memory, here is our 2010 list of the most expensive homes in San Francisco. As you can see from the list below, Pacific Heights dominated the top 10 sales list, with 6 out of the most expensive homes sold in 2011 located in that neighborhood. Presidio Heights comes in second place with two sales, and Yerba Buena and Russian Hill each have one sale.

Rank        Address                              Sales Price           Source
1 2840 Broadway $ 33,000,000 Tax
2 2950 Broadway $ 29,500,00 Tax/MLS
3 188 Minna St. – PHA $ 28,000,000 Tax
4 2920 Broadway $ 23,473,000 Tax
5 3070 Pacific Ave. $ 20,000,000 Tax
6 3701 Washington $ 12,100,000 Tax/MLS
7 2550 Green St. $ 9,500,000 Tax/MLS
8 3362 Jackson $ 9,250,000 Tax
9 2323 Hyde St. $ 9,000,000 MLS
10 60 Normandie Ter. $ 8,800,000 Tax/MLS

 

2840 Broadway was an off-market deal, while 188 Minna St. (the only condo to make the list this year, with all of the other sales being single family homes) was the foreclosure sale at The St. Regis that received plenty of press during the year.

It was clearly a good year to be among the 1%, with the 2011 most expensive sale coming in more than twice as high as the top 2010 sale (2600 Pacific Ave). Five of this year’s most expensive real estate deals were valued at $ 20,000,000 or more, while not one of the 2010 sales broke the twenty million dollar mark. Broadway Avenue kept it’s ranking as the most expensive street to live on, with three of this year’s sales located in the Pacific Heights stretch of Broadway, which was the same as last year.

So there you have it – the top 10 most expensive San Francisco home sales in 2011. Talk amongst yourselves about these homes and their respective sales prices. Good investment for the years to come, or outrageous and unjustifiable at any price? Keep your comments friendly but interesting :-)

 

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Mobile Homes of San Francisco

Tell someone you live in a mobile home in San Francisco and they’ll look at you like you’re crazy. Which you might be, but I digress. While San Francisco real estate might be known for six-figure sale prices in small packages, we aren’t known as the land of trailer parks. Perhaps it’s because we’re prone to earthquakes instead of tornadoes? There are a few homes in San Francisco, though, that are more mobile than their appearance suggests.

200 Woodside Ave., now found in the Forest Hill extension neighborhood but once part of St. Francis Wood, is one such house.

The Forest Hill Extension neighborhood was built out primarily in the 1920s, and most of the homes are finished in stucco and have a rather consistent look and feel to them – vaguely Spanish Med. 200 Woodside, on the other hand, is a cape-cod style home that is finished primarily with wood siding.

200 Woodside Ave. - A San Francisco Mobile Home

Below is a photo of the home in the context of its block, and as you can see 200 Woodside stands out as the home that doesn’t look like all of the others.

View of Forest Hill Extension

It turns out that the home was moved to this particular site back in the 1950′s, when Portola Drive was being widened. Below are several photos of Portola, before it was widened, during the construction, and how it looks today:

Portola before the street was widened

Portola when it was being widened, 1958

Portola Drive, 2012

Freeways were all the rage in the 1950s, and the plan at the time was to pretty much put a freeway everywhere. Portola wouldn’t have been turned into a freeway, but it was widened in the late 1950s to accomodate the additional traffic envisioned as a result of the freeway expansion. As you can see, it was doubled from a two-lane to a four-lane street.

I’m not sure where exactly the home at 200 Woodside Ave. started out, but it was somewhere over in the construction area and instead of being demolished it was moved to it’s current location.

The only other homes that I know of being relocated are a strip of Victorians in the Western Addition neighborhood that were moved back in the 1960s. How about you, what mobile homes in San Francisco do you know about?

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Portola Dr & O’Shaughnessy Blvd. – Then and Now

While doing some research for an upcoming blog post about Portola Dr. I came across this great picture of the strip mall located along Portola between Evelyn and Fowler that was taken in 1938. For comparison, I went out and took a picture from roughly the same vantage point last Friday. As you can see, the more things change, the more they stay the same!

Portola Dr. in 1938, source: foundsf.org

The Miraloma Appliance co. is now home to the Portola Cleaners, while the Merit Food Center has made way for Tower Burger (yum!). I can’t quite read the signs on the next two buildings, does anyone know what was once there?  However, the Miraloma Market (far right hand side of the picture) is still the Miraloma Market (although way back in 1938 it didn’t have a taqueria).

Portola Dr. in 2012, source: Matt Fuller, GRI

If the street configuration and parking lot looks a little different to you, then you get bonus stars for your eagle eyes. Portola street was widened in the 1950′s during the lets-build-freeways-everywhere craze, which actually resulted in some of the original homes on Portola Dr. being relocated to other spots in the city.

Anyway, just a fun little then and now picture to satisfy you on this Tuesday. I’m headed out the door for broker’s tour shortly, and will be visiting neighborhoods from the north end to the south side of the city. Not much to view in Miraloma Park today, but inventory across the city is slowly creeping back up.

Have a favorite spot in the city, or an old picture that would make for a great then and now comparison? Get in touch, I’m a big fan of San Francisco history and always love to learn more about the history of the streets and homes in San Francisco.

 

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Common Sense or Anti-Homeless?

The creation of parklets in San Francisco has led to some unintended consequences. They aren’t on park land, so park rules and regulations can’t be enforced. They aren’t a sidewalk, though, so sidewalk laws don’t apply. And even though they might be in the street, their design is such that laws governing what you can and can’t do in a street don’t quite fit either.

Parklet in the Inner Sunset (wouldn't be affected by the Wiener legislation, as written)

City Supervisor Scott Wiener has introduced legislation that will spell out what is and isn’t allowed in the two parklets in his district – both near the heart of the Castro.  According to the San Francisco Chronicle:

Highlights of Wiener’s legislation include banning sleeping at any time in the plazas; prohibiting camping, cooking or creating any kind of shelter; banning the selling or bartering of any merchandise without a permit; and prohibiting four-wheeled shopping carts. Also, plaza goers couldn’t smoke.

Violations would be an infraction with a maximum fine for repeat offenders of $500.

To me, this all sounds pretty innocuous and reasonable. It’s one thing to create a parklet with the hope of attracting visitors to liven up the streetscape during the day, it’s something else entirely to assume that means they can stay the night and set up a camp. Occupy parklet just doesn’t have the same ring as Occupy Wall Street.

People who make a living out of ‘advocating’ for the homeless are, expectedly, outraged and feel this is just one more horrible and mean-spirited piece of legislation.

My experience is that San Francisco bends over backwards to try and work with the homeless population and find solutions to a problem that has no easy solution, particularly given the larger framework of cuts at the state and national level for mental health care.

If we are truly compassionate, we should be focused on finding the dollars for mental health care, and not spewing outrage over common sense public courtesies. But those are just my two cents – what about yours?

 

 

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Glen Park Slime

IMG_7364

Destroyed Landscaping in Center Median

IMG_7365

View of Destroyed Plants in the Median

IMG_7363

View Towards Bosworth on O'Shaughnessy

IMG_7366

Additional View of the Vandalized Median

IMG_7367

The Vandalized Median

IMG_7374

Vandalized Succulent...

IMG_7373

Additional View of the Damage

IMG_7370

O'Shaughnessy approaching Bosworth

IMG_7368

View of Upper Pedestrian Median, Malta @ O'Shaughnessy

IMG_7369

Upper Pedestrian Median, not vandalized, at Malta/O'Shaughnessy

Glen Park has some slime. As you can see from the above photos, some individual or group of individuals thought it would be cool/funny/hilarious/a good use of taxpayer funds to destroy the new plants that are a part of the O’Shaughnessy/Bosworth traffic calming project. For those of you not familiar with the area, it’s a twisty road at the bottom of the canyon, and it was great to see the city take some steps to slow traffic down and make it look a little bit more beautiful.

While the vandals weren’t able to destroy the traffic calming street bulbs and center median planter, they managed to do a number on some of the succulent plants that had recently been planted by the city.

Jerks!

O’Shaughnessy / Bosworth Traffic Calming Project
This project was made possible in part by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority through a grant of Proposition K Local Sales Tax Funds.

Project Information
The O’Shaughnessy / Bosworth Traffic Calming Project began in August 2005. Read the O’Shaughnessy/Bosworth Meeting Notes – 8/30/05 meeting (PDF),O’Shaughnessy/Bosworth Final Traffic Calming Plan (PDF), and the Funding-Phasing Plan (PDF)

Project Update
A pedestrian refuge island was constructed at the intersection of O’Shaughnessy and Malta to assist pedestrians crossing the street at that intersection.  That island has recently been removed as part of a paving project for the O’Shaughnessy corridor but it will be reconstructed as part of the paving project.

A new crosswalk and pedestrian island will be constructed on O’Shaughnessy at the intersection with Del Vale.  The guardrail on the uphill side of the street will be opened up to allow pedestrians to cross at this location without the need to step over the guardrail.

Between Bosworth and Malta, a portion of the striped median will be opened up to allow for landscaping.  Adjacent curb extensions will be constructed to narrow the lanes just uphill of where the housing begins on O’Shaughnessy.  The intent is to create a gateway to let drivers know that there is a change from a mountain road to a residential area near a park.  This work will take place as part of the paving project.

Source: San Francisco MTA website

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

The Secret Community Garden in Diamond Heights

It’s not exactly a secret in the sense that you aren’t supposed to know about it, but it is secret in the sense that you probably don’t know it exists… What am I talking about?

I’m talking about a lush little plot of land, tucked away next to a Policy Academy, across the street from a large condominium complex, and at the entrance to a “sub-division” of single family homes known for their mid-century architecture and views of Glen Park Canyon

The Little Red Hen Community Garden in the Diamond Heights neighborhood opened on Mother’s Day of 2011. Later in the year they got their snazzy new sign, and in December of last year the Police Department threw a little party to help them celebrate.

Located on San Francisco police academy land, the community garden is immediately to the east of Amber Drive, just to the south of Duncan (to keep things confusing, Amber and Duncan intersect each other twice. The garden is located at the southern-most intersection of the two streets – closer to the Safeway shopping center than to Portola.

Diamond Heights has a deserved reputation for fog and blustery weather, so I was happily surprised to stumble across the Little Red Hen after previewing a classic mid-century home for sale in the Diamond Heights neighborhood. The Glen Park Association has a great write up about the project, and I’d also encourage you to visit the garden’s website to learn more about opportunities to garden in Diamond Heights.

According to the Glen Park Association website, the garden has been incredibly popular and there is currently a waiting list for garden plots. The site used to be overgrown and under-utilized, so it is really exciting to see what the efforts of some committed neighbors and neighborhood enthusiasts can make happen!

 

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

31 Years Later…

It’s been a big hole in the ground for a very, very, very long time. 2299 Market St. was once home to the Trinity Methodist Church, but it was destroyed by fire in 1981. More than 30 years later, the replacement building is finally arriving. Construction has begun on the development that will include 18 residential homes (all market rate, BMRs to be built off site) over roughly 5,000 square feet of ground floor retail. According to the planning department’s July 2010 discretionary review analysis, the mix of home sizes will consist of eight (8) one-bedroom homes, nine (9) two-bedroom homes, and one (1) three-bedroom home.

2299 Market St. - January 2012

2299 Market: Someday Soon?

At one point, the renderings done by the project architect, ib+a architecture, had an Apple logo on the ground floor retail space, setting the intertubes abuzz with gossip of a possible Apple Store at the location. The fruity giant to the south never confirmed nor denied such speculation, but more recent renderings have removed all such hints… The folks at ib+a have done plenty of other projects in San Francisco, with 555 4th St. (The Palms) being one of the larger projects that comes to mind, but their 1600 Webster project is much closer in size to this development.

As you can see from the above photos, a large hole in the ground (once the seasonal home of Delancey’s Christmas Tree sales) will be replaced with a five story building, with basement parking for 18 spots (achieved in part with a mechanical auto stacker, according to the architect’s website). The garage entrance will be on 16th street, next to Starbelly.

No word on when these will be completed, but if you feel like it you can track the progress of the building permits for 2299 Market St. online (the project has been in planning for years, the permits were finally issued in September of 2011).

The project developer is Angus McCarthy, who has to be happy that after years of negotiations with neighbors and neighborhood groups the shovels have finally hit the dirt at 2299 Market St.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

That’s Rather Lovely in… Pacific Heights

This week was the first Zephyr sales meeting of the year, and one of the first properties we toured was a top floor condo at 2950 Clay St. #302 listed by Danielle Lazier. If you are in the market for a condo in Pacific Heights, I’d encourage you to check it out. According to the tax records, it last sold in October of 2010 for $740,000.

While we were in the neighborhood looking for a parking spot, we drove by the home pictured below, and while driving by, for whatever reason, it caught my eye and I thought to myself “That’s Rather Lovely…” so I drove around the block again and took a picture.

The home is in the 2900 block of Washington St. and according to the tax records it is a 2 unit building with total building square footage of 2,840 square feet. It appears to have been in the same family for quite a while given that the annual tax bill for the building is a meager $2,464, and the only transaction noted in the tax record was a 2010 transfer from an individual to a family trust. Tax records also indicate it was built in 1900, which means a trip to the water department would be in order if you wanted to know the actual construction date.

That's Rather Lovely in Pacific Heights

It is located pretty much directly across the street from the Waldorf school of San Francisco, which certainly brings some traffic to the street (but you can be sure none of those cars will have a TV mounted in the back seat of the car, although that is a story for another day entirely).

Do you know anything else about this rather lovely Pacific Heights building? Know of a home that you think is rather lovely in SF? Share away in the comments below, and we’ll see if we can make this a regular 2012 feature.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

The Washingtonian

The Washingtonian at 1840 Washington St. in Pacific Heights has been getting a bit of buzz lately.

We gave it a full rundown with pictures yesterday over at our sibling site, NewConstructionSF.

Matt, the Photo Ninja

Photography and videography were a bit of a challenge yesterday, since the street is completely overrun with utility and construction vehicles, not to mention bulldozers and other noisy diesel creatures with back-up beepers that were continually beeping. The photo below is of me balancing on a ledge against a fence, trying to get some decent photos. Click on the picture to head over for our officially un-official photo gallery of 1840 Washington and the block. Nobody said being a real estate blogger was easy, but nobody said it would mean balancing on one foot on a skinny concrete ledge while smiling…

The building is located on Washington St. between Van Ness and Franklin. On the one hand, it’s a very busy spot with two major streets on either side of you. On the other hand, it’s an incredibly walk-friendly place, with WalkScore (TM) spitting out a perfect 100/100 rating. Which is an ironic walkscore rating since every home comes with 1 car parking. I can think of some other new buildings that have lower walkscores and less parking…

Directly across the street from The Washingtonian is the entrance to The Academy of Arts School of Industrial Design, so if you’re an angst ridden young designer with some deep pockets, 1840 Washington might just be your perfect next home!

It’s also not far from Lafayette Park, but I don’t yet know what the pet policy for the building will be. The building doesn’t have a ton of amenities, but it does offer a very nice roof deck and storage for every home that is on the same floor as the residence.

No word yet on when these homes will officially hit the market, or what pricing and HOA dues will be.

Disclaimer: We do not represent the developer of 1840 Washington St. and are not in any way affiliated with the developer or the listing agent (Sotheby’s). We offer buyers independent representation in new construction across all of San Francisco.

Learn More

 

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

849 Sanchez St. in San Francisco, CA 94114

849 Sanchez St. is a gorgeous art-deco home on a corner lot in the prestigious Liberty Hill area of the Castro/Eureka Valley neighborhood. If you are a fan of art-deco architecture, you owe it to yourself to see this home.

849 Sanchez, listed by Richard Bastoni, Sotheby's International Realty

849 Sanchez has been listed for sale several times over the past several years, and according to public tax records the last sales were in March of 2011 for a sales price of $3,200,000 and in 2008 for a sales price of $3,400,000. The public tax records (which aren’t always accurate) list the home as having 2,781 square feet, which calculates out to just shy of $1,200 per square foot of living space. 849 Sanchez was built in 1938 per tax records.

The home is beautifully done, and has beautiful views of downtown and the San Francisco bay. According to walkscore, the home is located in a ‘Walker’s Paradise’ with a ranking of 91/100. It’s important to remember, though, that the location at the top of the hill will make the return walk a little more daunting. But the incredible views make for an excellent reward and motivator as you walk up the hill.

The interior of the home has nice clean lines and plenty of open spaces. Glass brick is also used thoughtfully throughout the home. If you are a dog owner, you’ll appreciate the fact that is is a short walk to Dolores Park, one of the more popular spots in the city for dog owners to hang out, although the park isn’t without its controversies these days.

Interested in learning more about 849 Sanchez St. in San Francisco? If you aren’t currently working with an agent, please feel free to get in touch with us and we will happily provide answers to any questions you might have about this Liberty Hill luxury home.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
Please view our comment policy, disclaimers, and copyright notice (if that's your thing).