District 8: 2009 vs 2010 Median Price and Price Per Square Foot

If you own a home in the north-east part of San Francisco, what kind of year was 2010? Before I go on, district 8 in San Francisco is made up of the following neighborhoods: Tenderloin, Russian Hill, Telegraph Hill, Nob Hill, Financial District/Barbary Coast, North Beach, North Waterfront, Van Ness/Civic Center, Downtown. These neighborhoods vary significantly from each other in terms of housing stock, so what happens in one of these subdistricts isn’t particularly indicative of any other. If you are having trouble reading the charts, click on any of them for a larger image.

In comparing values in 2010 to 2009, only 3 D8 neighborhoods saw an increase in median home price, led by Nob Hill with Civic Center/Van Ness just barely squeaking out an increase. All of the other neighborhoods were down, with the Financial District/Barbary Coast turning in the worst performance and the Downtown subdistrict turning in the least bad of the bad numbers.

The least expensive D8 neighborhood was Downtown (think Tenderloin, the change in MLS subdistricts in late 2010 causes some issues here), with a median price of $413,500 while the perennially prestigious Russian Hill came in as the most expensive with a median price of $1,015,000. If we try and attempt to adjust for difference in average size by neighborhood and look at price per square foot (which has other issues, as I’ve discussed), then we see the Financial District/Barbary Coast as the most expensive at $1,211 per square foot and Van Ness/Civic Center as the least expensive at $619 per square foot.

What trends stand out to you?

Median Home Price, District 8

Price per Square Foot, District 8

District 8

As always, all data is from the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service (SFARMLS). These are my feelings about $/Sq.Ft. metrics and the median average.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

District 7: 2009 vs 2010 Median Price and Price Per Square Foot

If you own a home in the north part of San Francisco, what kind of year was 2010? Before I go on, district 7 in San Francisco is made up of the following neighborhoods: Presidio Heights, Pacific Heights, Cow Hollow and the Marina. These are some of the classic San Francisco neighborhoods that people think of when they think of San Francisco real estate. If you are having trouble reading the charts, click on any of them for a larger image.

In comparing values in 2010 to 2009, two D7 neighborhoods saw a decrease in median home price, and the other two saw an increase. Pacific Heights had the greatest increase in median home price followed by Cow Hollow while Presidio Heights saw the greatest decrease, followed by the Marina. It should also be noted that in these neighborhoods there are a not insignificant number of “off-market” deals that are not reported in the MLS, so their impact is not reflected in our charts and graphs below.

The least expensive D7 neighborhood in 2010 was the Marina, with a median price of $1,240,000, while the ever prestigious Presidio Heights came in as the most expensive with a median price of $2,027,500. If we try and attempt to adjust for difference in average size by neighborhood and look at price per square foot (which has other issues, as I’ve discussed), we get the exact same results with Presidio Heights leading and the Marina bringing up the rear.

What trends stand out to you?

District 7

Median Home Price, District 7

Price per Square Foot, District 7

District 7

As always, all data is from the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service (SFARMLS). These are my feelings about $/Sq.Ft. metrics and the median average.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

SF Blu Penthouse Floorplans

There are six penthouse homes at SF Blu, at 631 Folsom St. (corner of Folsom and 2nd). They each occupy three floors, with two levels for living space and one for the solarium and deeded roof deck. The main entrance for all of the penthouse homes is on the 21st floor of the building, but there is a secondary egress on the 20th floor, which is the private level with all of the bedrooms for each of the penthouse homes. All of the homes offer great views of either downtown, the San Francisco bay, or Twin Peaks depending on the orientation of the home.

The building is located in the Yerba Buena subdistrict (neighborhood) of the South of Market Area. It offers great access to downtown, as well as numerous restaurants, the San Francisco bay, Ferry building and farmer’s market, museums, and plenty of nightlife. It is also a short walk from the SF Giant’s ballpark. It offers fairly convenient access to both I-280 and 101, and is a relatively short walk to either Muni or BART transit systems.

As built, the SF Blu penthouses advertise the following features:

  • 3 bedrooms, 2.5 baths
  • Private rooftop solariums and roof terraces
  • 2 floors devoted to living, dining and entertaining
  • Lower private floor for bedrooms with its own separate access
  • Panoramic views from every level
  • Wood flooring throughout second level living and dining areas
  • Floor to ceiling and wrap-around corner windows
  • Miele in-home washery and dryer
  • Central heat and air conditioning

Kitchens:

  • Viking stainless steel appliances
  • Viking under-counter built-in wine refrigerator
  • Fisher Paykel double drawer dishwasher
  • European kitchen cabinetry with undermount halogen task lighting
  • Granite kitchen counters with undermount stainless steel sinks

Baths:

  • Custom cabinetry
  • Marble vanity top with undermount sink
  • Marble flooring, counters and shower surrounds (Master)
  • Double designer sinks (Master)
  • Frameless glass shower enclosure (Master)

Siteplan for SF Blu Penthouse Level 21

The team behind the building consists of Lennar Urban, Malcolm Properties, Inc. and Handel Architects, LLP.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

District 6: 2009 vs 2010 Median Price and Price Per Square Foot

While CoreLogic and NAR argue about who has better data, we continue on with our look at San Francisco data.

If you own a home in the north-central part of San Francisco, what kind of year was 2010? Before I go on, district 6 in San Francisco is made up of the following neighborhoods: North Panhandle, Alamo Square, Anza Vista, Hayes Valley, Lower Pacific Heights and Western Addition. These neighborhoods are each fairly distinct from each other in terms of housing stock, so what happens in one of these subdistricts isn’t very indicative of any other. If you are having trouble reading the charts, click on any of them for a larger image.

In comparing values in 2010 to 2009, only 1 D6 neighborhood saw a decrease in median home price, and surprisingly enough that was Hayes Valley.  All of the other neighborhoods were up, with Anza Vista turning in the strongest performance with a 19% increase in median sale price year over year.

The least expensive D6 neighborhood was Western Addition, with a median price of $549,000, while the currently buzzworthy North Panhandle came in as the most expensive with a median price of $842,000 (contrary to a 7×7 report…). If we try and attempt to adjust for difference in average size by neighborhood and look at price per square foot (which has other issues, as I’ve discussed), then we see Hayes Valley as the most expensive at $728 per square foot and Alamo Square as the least expensive at $418 per square foot. Before you flip out, it should also be noted that Alamo Square had the largest median home size, at 1,950 square feet, almost double the smallest of 1,030 in Hayes Valley. As square footage goes up, price per square foot tends to decrease, hence the low price per square foot in Alamo Square.

What trends stand out to you?

District 6

Median Home Prices, District 6

Price per Square Foot, District 6

% Changes in Median Home price and Price Per Square Foot

As always, all data is from the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service (SFARMLS). These are my feelings about $/Sq.Ft. metrics and the median average.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

District 5: 2009 vs 2010 Median Price and Price Per Square Foot

If you own a home in the central part of San Francisco, what kind of year was 2010? Before I go on, district 5 in San Francisco is made up of the following neighborhoods: Clarendon Heights, Buena Vista/Ashbury Heights, Cole Valley/Parnassus Heights, Noe Valley, Eureka Valley/Dolores Heights, Glen Park, Duboce Triangle, Corona Heights, Haight Ashbury, Mission Dolores, and Twin Peaks. These neighborhoods all have a mix of property types (except Clarendon Heights, which is almost all detached single family homes), including single family homes, condos in larger and smaller complexes, and TICs in a variety of building sizes. If you are having trouble reading the charts, click on any of them for a larger image.

In comparing values in 2010 to 2009, only two D5 neighborhoods saw a decrease in median home price, with the rest either being flat or much higher. Both Clarendon Heights and Corona Heights turned in negative performances on median home price, although Corona Heights was up on a price per square foot basis.

The least expensive D5 neighborhood was Twin Peaks, with a median price of $622,000, while its neighbor Clarendon Heights came in as the most expensive with a median price of $1,556,250. If we try and attempt to adjust for difference in average size by neighborhood and look at price per square foot (which has other issues, as I’ve discussed), then we see Buena Vista/Ashbury Heights as the most expensive at $1,165 per square foot and the Haight Ashbury as the least expensive at $559 per square foot.

What trends stand out to you?

District 5

Median Home Price

Price per Square Foot

% Change, Price per Square Foot and Median Home Price, District 5

As always, all data is from the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service (SFARMLS). These are my feelings about $/Sq.Ft. metrics and the median average.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Our Valentines Day Post to You: SF Blu

SF Blu. It rhymes easily, which makes it a great candidate for our Valentine’s day post. *Cough, cough, clears throat*

Roses are Red,
SF Penthouses at Blu,
Our Valentines Day post for You.

Awful, I know. I had the pleasure of being at SF Blu, located on Folsom at 2nd street in the Yerba Buena district – last Friday for a luxury market meeting with my colleagues at Zephyr. In addition to reviewing how the market for luxury properties in San Francisco was doing, we took time to tour the remaining penthouses available at the SF Blu project.

There are six penthouses in total, with three remaining as of Friday. Those with the most amazing views sold first, and currently Penthouses B, C and F remain. Although, to be fair, I must say that the views from Penthouse F are pretty spectacular. It is the largest of the remaining homes, with an asking price of $2,925,000. The least expensive that remains in Penthouse B with an asking price of $2,500,000. Square footage runs from approximately 2,245 for floorplan B to 2,573 for floorplan F. For those of you not interested in the penthouses, they have about 10 or 15 of their 2 bedroom 2 bath models available.

All of the penthouse homes are on three levels, with private living space on the lowest level, the main entrance, living room, dining room, and kitchen on the main level, and a solarium and private roof deck on the top floor. It is a nicely done and thoughtful division of space, and for those with families or who just like their private rooms kept private, you will definitely appreciate the layout.

Finishes are nicely done throughout, essentially what you would expect for a home in this price range, although I personally am not a fan of the cabinet and appliance white oak finish in the kitchens. But your mileage may vary. The master bath is spacious, and I absolutely love the bathtub they went with. Below are photos I snapped, I apologize for the quality of some of them but it should give you a good feel for the space and finishes. Click on any thumbnail for a larger image.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

District 4: 2009 vs 2010 Median Price and Price Per Square Foot

If you own a home in the central-west part of San Francisco, what kind of year was 2010? Before I go on, district 4 in San Francisco is made up of the following neighborhoods: St. Francis Wood, Monterey Heights, Forest Hill, Balboa Terrace, West Portal, Ingleside Terrace, Mt. Davidson Manor, Forest Hill Extension, Sherwood Forest, Westwood Highlands, Westwood Park, Forest Knolls, Midtown Terrace, Miraloma Park, Sunnyside, Diamond Heights. With the exception of Diamond Heights which has a large stock of condominiums,  all of these neighborhoods consist primarily of single family homes although the style and average size varies substantially from one ‘hood to the next. If you are having trouble reading the charts, click on any of them for a larger image.

In comparing values in 2010 to 2009, 7 D4 neighborhoods saw an increase in median home price, while 9 saw a decrease. Destination D4 ‘hoods like St. Francis Wood, Forest Hill, and West Portal all turned in solid performances while Ingleside Terrace and Sherwood Forest brought up the rear of the list.

The least expensive D4 neighborhood was Diamond Heights, with a median price of $520,000 which makes sense given that DH is the only neighborhood with a large mix of condominiums. St. Francis Wood came in as the most expensive with a median price of $1,909,000. If we try and attempt to adjust for difference in average size by neighborhood and look at price per square foot (which has other issues, as I’ve discussed), then we see the exact same results, with St. Francis Wood being the most expensive and Diamond Heights being the least expensive on a price per square foot basis.

What trends stand out to you?

District 4 Price Data

Median Home Price

Price per Square Foot

Correlation between Price per Square Foot and Median Home Price Changes

All data is from the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service (SFARMLS). These are my feelings about $/Sq.Ft. metrics and the median average.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

District 2: 2009 vs 2010 Median Price and Price Per Square Foot

If you own a home in the central west part of San Francisco, what kind of year was 2010? Before I go on, I’ll explain that district 2 in San Francisco is made up of the following neighborhoods: Golden Gate Heights, Outer Parkside, Outer Sunset, Parkside, Central Sunset, Inner Sunset, and Inner Parkside. If you are having trouble reading the charts, click on any of them for a larger image.

Golden Gate Heights was the only D2 neighborhood that showed a year over year increase in median price, with all of the other neighborhoods coming in between barely down (-0.7% for the Parkside) and down (-9.4% for the Inner Sunset). On a price per square foot basis, Golden Gate Heights and the Outer Sunset were up while all other D2 neighborhoods were barely down (-1% for the Central Sunset) to down (-11% for the Parkside). The only neighborhood that saw a positive correlation in both price per square foot and median home price was Golden Gate Heights.

The least expensive D2 neighborhood was the Outer Parkside, with a median price of $629,500 while the most expensive was Golden Gate Heights, with a median price of $900,000. If we try and attempt to correct for difference in average size by neighborhood and look at price per square foot (which has other issues, as I’ve discussed), then Golden Gate Heights again clocks in as the most expensive neighborhood with the Parkside (not Outer) coming in as the least expensive neighborhood on a $/Sq.Ft. basis.

What trends stand out to you?

D2 Neighborhood Summary

Median Home Price, District 2

Price per Square Foot, District 2

% Change Price Per Square Foot and Median Price, District 2

All data is from the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service (SFARMLS). These are my feelings about $/Sq.Ft. metrics and the median average.

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Palace of Fine Arts in the Marina Neighborhood

San Francisco had amazing weather this past weekend. And I had company in town. So while we were out visiting the Exploratorium, I split off from the group for a few minutes and grabbed a little footage of the Palace of Fine Arts in the Marina neighborhood. I hope you enjoy!

While I was researching the narration for the video I ended up learning a lot about the site that I didn’t originally know. For example, I had no idea that the palace of fine arts was once used as 18 tennis courts, storage for the Army, or as a telephone book distribution center. Telephone book? What’s that?! It was also such a popular building during the exposition that a campaign to save it from destruction had begun before the expo had even ended. And who says San Francisco hasn’t always liked a good cause?

The Palace of Fine Arts was originally built for the 1915 Panama Pacific International Exposition, which was theoretically a celebration of the opening of the Panama Canal but was really just a great excuse to throw a party and show the world how well San Francisco had recovered from the 1906 earthquake. For those of you who think San Francisco vanity is a recent phenomenon, I offer you the 1915 expo as proof that we’ve always been a vain city! It was completely demolished and rebuilt in 1965 because the lightweight materials it was originally built with were never designed to last for a long period and it was literally crumbling to the ground.

Another renovation and seismic upgrade were recently completed, and I highly encourage you to get outside and enjoy this San Francisco treasure. One more fun fact: Only two buildings built for the 1915 Panama Pacific International Exposition remain standing in their original locations. One of them is the Palace of Fine Arts. Any guesses about the other building?

Palace of Fine Arts, San Francisco

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Price Per Square Foot: A Useful San Francisco Metric?

Ah, price per square foot. Is it a valid metric when pricing real estate? But more importantly (to me, at least), is a the more narrow question of it is a valid metric when pricing San Francisco real estate? This is a topic that inspires heated discussion, debate, and feelings, so let’s keep it friendly and respectful in the comments. Below is my opinion on price per square foot in San Francisco, based on my experience as a realtor in San Francisco over the past 9 years. I’ll start with where I think it can be a useful yardstick.

Price per square foot can be a useful metric when you are comparing apples to apples. For example, within a particular condominium building or project – One Hawthorne, One Rincon, The Infinity, or Millennium Tower, for example. If you have a basically interchangeable housing style, lofts in a box built around 2000 in San Francisco in district 9 for example, then price per square foot can again be a useful metric. But the amount of “apples to apples” housing stock in San Francisco is fairly limited and most of it is centered around district 9 neighborhoods like South Beach, Yerba Buena, or South of Market.

Price per square foot, as a general rule, is not a good metric for San Francisco real estate because our homes are so individual and distinct. Every home is unique, and given that many of our neighborhoods have diverse and widely varying housing stock, price per square foot becomes a poor measure when comparing house A to house B in Noe Valley. In addition to basic features like layout, room count, architectural style and property condition, price per square foot fails to take into account many intangibles like how light and airy a home feels, or if it is considered a good block or a heavily trafficked block that is less desirable.

I bring all of this up because in the coming days I’m going to be publishing an incredible amount of charts and statistics about San Franicsco real estate performance in 2010 compared to 2009. One of the metrics I have charted for San Francisco neighborhoods is price per square foot. Not because it is an excellent metric to calculate what the value of a particular home is, but because it is an often asked for metric, and it can help in validating high level trends about pricing direction. But before I present all the data, I just wanted to raise my concerns and feelings about price per square foot.

2010 vs. 2009 Reports:

Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
Please view our comment policy, disclaimers, and copyright notice (if that's your thing).